You didn't specifically say to clear this certain problem up. You sent a message to all editors that we aren't allowed to revert/undo a admin's edit, even if we disagree and that it should be discussed. Although I forget when you did.
This Helmet was worn when Ryugen accessed Kiwi Arms. That was the end of the BR Saga. The same helmet would be worn (in a different color) in Yomotsu Heguri Arms.
If it's a different colour, surely it's a different helmet? Fact is we need to wait for info on the show's website. And the episode page linked to didn't mention the name Kiuimen at all, so not knowing what it was, I removed the note, with the edit summary saying "first time WHAT appears?". You was correct to take it to my wall, but not because of Nbajammer's say-so. It's rule number one. Don't revert an admin, take it to a talk page.
By the way, wikilinks don't work in message wall thread titles.
Bandai Namco will released a crossover game titled "Super Hero Generation". The crossover game is a tactical RPG involved characters from Kamen Rider franchise with those in Ultraman and Gundam franchises.
Should a page to be created in this wiki or Tokupedia?
Dfhhgfhakamenridershitlord replaced some words on Mitsuzane Kureshima's page with some profanity. I get it that Mitsuzane has become insane on the show but this has gone too far. I just had to revert his edits.
Toku fanon was founded to eliminate this problem and Rangerboard and other sites are great for debating stuff like this.
As for the rules, I find comments that users cannot see them when we have to use the 'ol banhammer. While the Style Guide is in plain sight overhead in the Community section, it probably wouldn't hurt to post them again on the front page for those looking to find out how our wiki works.
Disrespect is certainly in play here, though that could've been due to Gundamfan99's frustration to the constant delete. While I admit that a simple glance at the Rules section would notify him/her that it's not okay to discuss stuff that doesn't pertain to the construction of the wiki, I find that that the two week block is somewhat harsh. The person literally joined on the KR wikia since June 04, 2014. I was thinking it could be lowered to one week due to this is probably just a huge misunderstanding that escalated due to the negativity that the other user experienced with his/her's questions being deleted.
Except that he posted it on 3-4 pages/walls. And called the admins incompetent (which he has no way to know), acts like he could do a better job (what a first impression!), called people he literally just met only 1 year old because they were asleep and enforcing the rules he agreed to abide by, erroneously referred to a lack of a response as an attitude problem (something cannot be an attitude problem if it does not exist), etc. No, two weeks was being generous and it is our expectation he will behave himself upon his return.
It would be nice if we just told users the rules and the reasons for it when their edits are reverted (or at least the ones that are like Gundamfan's (the fanfare or overly eager kind), not the ones that just leave junk like purposely wrong information or obscene images). This could clear up some misunderstandings like what happened here. It's a thought but still worth thinking about.
The unfortunate truth is that people simply don't seek out the rules, or if they do, they simply refuse to abide by them. When you go to the store and buy a new computer program, you have to accept the license agreement (i.e. rules of use) for it. How many people honest-to-god actually read the license? If they download a program, it will have the license shown during nstallation. Again how may will read it? We could tell the users the rules when edits are reverted, or put them on the main page, or send it to their e-mail (presumably). Doesn't mean they'll read them. As the saying goes, you can lead a horse to water but you can't make him drink. The only ones who will read and follow the rules are the ones who want to make good use of the site and the information it provides. Everyone else, like this guy, will not - and then complain when they get punished. Fact of the matter is nothing we do can/will make them read the rules, even if we shove the rules in their face.
So I was wondering what I did with Kota's page was actually OK to do? (The History portion) I simplified his History and broke it into sub sections using that Tabbing thing, splitting it from TV Series | Other Appearances, which I think is a lot more convenient considering that the original Kota page was cluttered with useless information before it got flagged to be revised.